Lenovo 90FC000WUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemLenovo 90FC000WUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3649
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180717
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 02 '22 at 05:36
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 158
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 240
36% 263 Pts
64-Core 299
18% 299 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750Ti
Legend(17AA 3649) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8875
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
18% Very poor
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 18
Parallax 20.5
19% 20.4 fps
MRender 24.7
Gravity 23.4
Splatting 16.2
17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2.5 240GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42051100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 128 107 119 133 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 428
Write 356
Mixed 366
SusWrite 142
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 34.7
117% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 56.9
71% 128 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
40.5% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 10.8
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.1
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90FC000WUS Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90FC000WUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback