Lenovo 90FC000VUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 90FC000VUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3649
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160427
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateNov 26 '18 at 22:35
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 109
2-Core 216
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 568
59% 474 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750Ti
Legend(17AA 3649) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1681
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 15.7
16% 17 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 17
17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon L8H-128V2G 128GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G872201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 154 122 142 143 154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 461
Write 38.3
Mixed 204
SusWrite 136
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 43.1
154% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 167
134% 195 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
757GB free
Firmware: 07.01A07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 79 90 88 90 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 80.5
Write 32.5
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 72.8
43% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
40.6% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 11.9
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90FC000VUS Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90FC000VUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback