Asus ProArt StudioBook W7600H5A_W7600H5A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ProArt StudioBook W7600H5A_W7600H5A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK W7600H5A
Memory52.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210830
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateJul 02 '22 at 00:19
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-11955M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 67.5
1-Core 148
2-Core 268
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 753
75% 610 Pts
64-Core 1061
66% 1061 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 17CC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
7.48% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 169
Parallax 9.9
7% 62.3 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 9.5
9% 11 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.48%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
3TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1822 1967 1896 1909 1989 1989 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2,789
Write 1993
Mixed 1,393
SusWrite 1,929
453% 2,026 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 74.6
229% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 872
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 657
466% 609 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 328%
Great: 672%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer D43.27304S.002 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
90% Outstanding
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 30.2
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 40.1
SC Mixed 19
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 90%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProArt StudioBook W7600H5A_W7600H5A Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

System: Asus ProArt StudioBook W7600H5A_W7600H5A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback