Asrock 990FX Extreme9

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Extreme9 (all builds)
Memory	7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160329
Uptime	7.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 01 '22 at 20:00
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6100-$68 44,863 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	53.5% Above average	Memory 78.6 1-Core 49.5 2-Core 91.4 48% 73.2 Pts	4-Core 159 8-Core 206 23% 182 Pts	64-Core 217 14% 217 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362 42,960 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Palit(1569 1183) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1527 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Lighting 30.7 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 42.5 25% 34.5 fps	MRender 39.6 Gravity 38.9 Splatting 32.1 30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 296 282 205 151 140 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Read 455 Write 296 Mixed 294 SusWrite 221 71% 317 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 51.3 4K Mixed 28.9 103% 35.3 MB/s	DQ Read 212 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 64.9 78% 137 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 128%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 56GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 218 228 237 276 220 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Read 449 Write 413 Mixed 380 SusWrite 248 84% 373 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 50.9 4K Mixed 32.9 113% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 215 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 176 140% 194 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0. BLT4G3D1608DT1TX0. BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0. 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.9% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 11.7 34% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 10.2 23% 8.03 GB/s	Latency 83.1 48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Extreme9 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme9 - $218

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	48x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	27x
FX-9370AMD $194Bench 62%, 9,054 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples	5x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	5x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x
PM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 2,882 samples	4x

RAM
BLS4G3D1609ES2LX0. CT51264BA160BJ.C8F BLS4G3D1609ES2LX0. CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 16GBUnknownBench 29%, 10 samples	4x
Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 58%, 5,634 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $642

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16