Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive14.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75M-D3V  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140417
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 01 '22 at 19:07
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 186
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 346
48% 353 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Asus(1043 84EA) 2GB
CLim: 993 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
7.33% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 11.1
7% 9.37 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 9.3
8% 9.73 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.33%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Blaze 60GB-$62
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 17 20 17 9.9 13 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.7% Very poor
Read 47.8
Write 13.1
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 14.8
8% 35 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 8.2
35% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 32.3
DQ Write 18
DQ Mixed 6.7
10% 19 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
28GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 60 60 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
42% Average
Read 85.1
Write 85.2
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 60.7
53% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 42%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS2G3D1339DS1S00. 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B75M-D3V Builds (Compare 1,412 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback