Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive24.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75M-D3V  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '21 at 10:26
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 194
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 365
50% 371 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Asus(1043 84EA) 2GB
CLim: 993 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
7.4% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 10.1
7% 9.07 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 9.3
8% 9.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.4%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Blaze 60GB-$62
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 19 19 15 14 13 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.9% Poor
Read 28.3
Write 33.8
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 17.9
6% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 9.4
76% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29.7
DQ Write 14.2
DQ Mixed 9.9
10% 17.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$20
43GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 77 78 79 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 63.3
Write 58.5
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 78.9
45% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS2G3D1339DS1S00. 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B75M-D3V Builds (Compare 1,410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback