Asrock X370 Killer SLI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Killer SLI (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190703
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 01 '22 at 13:34
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Memory 77.8 1-Core 123 2-Core 244 81% 148 Pts	4-Core 476 8-Core 762 76% 619 Pts	64-Core 916 57% 916 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gainward(10B0 1B06) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 109% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SN6S-256G-1006 256GB 4,074 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: X3511006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 254 251 243 252 254 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 433 Write 364 Mixed 285 SusWrite 257 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 75.9 4K Mixed 36.7 135% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 285 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 203 168% 241 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 92%
Samsung MZNLN512HMJP-000H1 512GB 1,400 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 448GB free Firmware: MAV21H3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 476 480 478 484 484 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 472 Mixed 395 SusWrite 480 104% 461 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 92.4 4K Mixed 56.2 186% 63.8 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 362 273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 128%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 8GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 8.8 10 9.6 10 9.6 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	8.34% Terrible	Read 27.1 Write 8.2 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 9.3 16% 14.2 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 37% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 8.34% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB-$90 9,857 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	MC Read 33.7 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 29.6 90% 31.6 GB/s	SC Read 25.3 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 28.7 82% 28.9 GB/s	Latency 84.8 47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Killer SLI Builds (Compare 405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 60%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Killer SLI

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	63x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	55x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	39x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	36x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	35x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	34x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $81Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	16x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x
PSD416G24002 2x16GBPatriotBench 79%, 353 samples	10x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 113% - Outstanding

Total price: $453

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16