ECT One Computer AMD FX-8320, 8x

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 153%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive355% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemECT One Computer AMD FX-8320, 8x  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B450M-A
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220209
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJul 01 '22 at 13:23
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$176
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 79.3
1-Core 175
2-Core 349
106% 201 Pts
4-Core 662
8-Core 1,169
110% 915 Pts
64-Core 1,618
100% 1,618 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 87C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 204
Parallax 214
178% 212 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 152
Splatting 133
128% 160 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 149%
Great: 158%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
522GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1440 1354 1398 1366 1369 1362 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
355% Outstanding
Read 2,707
Write 2,537
Mixed 1,946
SusWrite 1,381
480% 2,143 MB/s
4K Read 73.4
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 102
343% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1363
DQ Write 1,126
DQ Mixed 1,204
913% 1231 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 355%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$103
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.3% Good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 26.9
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 28.3
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical One Computer AMD FX-8320, 8x Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 146%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO

System: ECT One Computer AMD FX-8320, 8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $872
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback