Intel X79-2011

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X79-2011  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200319
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJul 01 '22 at 11:02
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 69
2-Core 138
57% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 633
56% 476 Pts
64-Core 816
50% 816 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.47 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
3% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Av256 S-Force 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0111A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 389 396 395 387 384 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.8% Excellent
Read 460
Write 401
Mixed 378
SusWrite 394
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 18.3
96% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 45.5
86% 166 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G70BH0- 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.9% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 14.6
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.9
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79-2011 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Intel X79-2011

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $529
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback