HP 500-098

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 500-098  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ADA
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130205
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 13 '17 at 01:01
Run Duration305 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 87
2-Core 175
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 325
44% 326 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570
Device(1B0A 90C4) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.79% Terrible
Lighting 8.47
Reflection 9.46
Parallax 10.5
7% 9.48 fps
MRender 7.95
Gravity 7.57
Splatting 8.43
7% 7.98 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.79%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
189GB free
Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.8% Average
Read 263
Write 180
Mixed 185
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 8.96
54% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 44.5
61% 113 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 97%
PNY SSD2SC240G1CS1754D117-820 240GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS111101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.7% Average
Read 267
Write 252
Mixed 261
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 14.8
64% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 18.8
DQ Write 44.1
DQ Mixed 14
16% 25.7 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 87%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OABX0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 186
Mixed 166
131% 174 MB/s
4K Read 1.06
4K Write 2.35
4K Mixed 0.22
112% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 Samsung M378B5173CB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17.6
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-098 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-098

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback