Aftershock N95TP6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAftershock N95TP6  (all builds)
MotherboardAftershock N95TP6
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180131
Uptime19.1 Days
Run DateJun 30 '22 at 09:02
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 196
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 382
44% 340 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 951B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1659
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.3% Below average
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 48.6
24% 36.2 fps
MRender 54.6
Gravity 52.1
Splatting 56.1
45% 54.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N600 M.2 120GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0921B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 60 57 54 58 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 398
Write 360
Mixed 336
SusWrite 92.1
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 33.8
105% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 93.3
DQ Mixed 84.5
88% 150 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 101%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
450GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 91 89 91 89 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 117
Write 103
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 88.4
60% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 22.9
80% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 24.3
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N95TP6 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Aftershock N95TP6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $186
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback