Asrock H61TM-ITX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H61TM-ITX  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '22 at 19:29
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 100
2-Core 140
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 374
51% 377 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0152) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.54% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.53 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.54%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09610
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 228 224 230 219 224 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.3% Above average
Read 215
Write 200
Mixed 182
SusWrite 223
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 23.8
91% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 141
112% 156 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 240%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.9% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61TM-ITX Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61TM-ITX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $206
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback