Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '22 at 15:12
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 184
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 544
54% 442 Pts
64-Core 664
41% 664 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44% Average
Lighting 55.5
Reflection 55
Parallax 75
45% 61.8 fps
MRender 54.8
Gravity 61.1
Splatting 40.9
42% 52.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1120A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 43 5.7 37 3.8 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 387
Write 282
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 47.6
40% 184 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 0.3
19% 6.37 MB/s
DQ Read 61
DQ Write 16
DQ Mixed 0.4
10% 25.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 97%
Maxone USB 3.0 500GB
322GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 99 97 97 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 103
Write 103
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 97.4
66% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 17.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 19.6
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback