Asus P7P55D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P7P55D  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '22 at 12:16
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 59.6
2-Core 127
59% 93.2 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 257
34% 253 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5830
MSI(1462 2092) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 16.7
15% 16.3 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 14
Splatting 9.9
9% 11.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 11 41 53 58 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 33.9
Write 29.5
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 43.2
28% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
75% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
39.6% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 10.6
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D Builds (Compare 1,222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback