Toshiba Satellite S50t-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite S50t-C  (all builds)
MotherboardFF50 06F3
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151006
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 12 '17 at 15:29
Run Duration422 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Memory 21.7
1-Core 12.6
2-Core 22.4
13% 18.9 Pts
4-Core 34.6
8-Core 34.9
5% 34.8 Pts
64-Core 34.6
2% 34.6 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Toshiba(1179 F840) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4574
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
1.98% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 4.04
Parallax 1.97
2% 2.7 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 1.77
Splatting 4.22
2% 2.88 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.98%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT2100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 479
Write 243
Mixed 302
75% 341 MB/s
4K Read 9.18
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 6.12
32% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 11.9
DQ Write 18.5
DQ Mixed 16.7
12% 15.7 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 100%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 91.9
Write 99
Mixed 92.4
123% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.23
72% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 42%
WD My Passport 259F 3TB
1TB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 85.8
Write 5.45
Mixed 7.58
26% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.24
66% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 49%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
74GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 128
Write 34.7
Mixed 46.7
72% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.75
4K Write 1.11
4K Mixed 0.5
65% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 308
13% 308 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite S50t-C Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite S50t-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $62
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback