Asrock 890FX Deluxe3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 890FX Deluxe3  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101006
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '22 at 21:48
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 77.7
1-Core 54.4
2-Core 113
51% 81.7 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 336
35% 282 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1370 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.2.2
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
24% Poor
Lighting 30.7
Reflection 28.3
Parallax 40.4
25% 33.1 fps
MRender 28.1
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 22.1
22% 27.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 254 257 289 314 258 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 462
Mixed 410
SusWrite 273
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 40.9
162% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 22.2
84% 186 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
427GB free
Firmware: 20.01H20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 118 118 118 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 115
Write 117
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 117
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/4G000 KRE-D3U1600M/4G000 BLS4G3D169DS1J.8FE BLS4G3D169DS1J.8FE 16GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.3% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 14.3
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.3
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 890FX Deluxe3 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 890FX Deluxe3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback