Microelectronics G435

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 212%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics214% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicroelectronics G435  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock Z490 Phantom Gaming 4/ax
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '22 at 22:22
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$224
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 97.2
1-Core 148
2-Core 257
95% 167 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 1,026
95% 794 Pts
64-Core 1,583
98% 1,583 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
214% Outstanding
Lighting 317
Reflection 297
Parallax 329
258% 314 fps
MRender 359
Gravity 256
Splatting 190
211% 268 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 214%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 981 872 760 616 522 564 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,568
Write 1,741
Mixed 1,289
SusWrite 719
299% 1,329 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 71.7
248% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,263
DQ Write 852
DQ Mixed 1,053
787% 1,056 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 230%
Great: 276%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
467GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 362 352 346 208 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 330
Write 375
Mixed 318
SusWrite 277
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 23.7
78% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 27
67% 139 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD416E86-3200D 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 31.6
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 44.4
SC Mixed 32.1
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 49.6
81% 49.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G435 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

System: Microelectronics G435

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $583
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback