Asus Z9PE-D16 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus Z9PE-D16 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D16 Series
Memory186.1 GB free of 192 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '22 at 18:20
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 163
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 609
56% 470 Pts
64-Core 2,490
154% 2,490 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8528) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1757 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
7.96% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 8
1% 4.27 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 41.9
Splatting 9.1
22% 29.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 7.96%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 460 462 455 474 475 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 455
Mixed 346
SusWrite 461
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 40.6
136% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 193
190% 303 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 106%
Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
510GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 465 467 470 475 475 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 468
Mixed 447
SusWrite 470
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 48.4
153% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 344
258% 345 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2K70CM0-YF 12x16GB
12 of 16 slots used
192GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.5% Very good
MC Read 48.2
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 21.6
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PE-D16 Series Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D16 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $317
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback