bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DH55TC
Memory0.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111206
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 25 '22 at 18:44
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 74
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 165
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 216
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Gigabyte(1458 352E) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.91% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 0.5
2% 2.33 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.91%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GOODRAM 120GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM01.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 229 217 224 216 226 MB/s
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.4% Above average
Read 250
Write 227
Mixed 208
SusWrite 223
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 21.4
84% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 150
122% 172 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
270GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 126 126 127 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 128
Write 128
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 126
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 109%
Samsung HD754JJ 750GB
281GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 113 115 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 108
Write 52.8
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 115
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-001.A00LF 99U5474-001.A00LF 3GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
30.4% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 11.4
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.9
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $136
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback