bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DH55TC
Memory1.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 17 '22 at 04:08
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 71.6
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 149
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 205
26% 200 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Gigabyte(1458 352E) 1GB
CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 354 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
2.07% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 1.2
2% 2.73 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.07%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GOODRAM 120GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM01.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 217 218 218 223 219 MB/s
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.5% Above average
Read 248
Write 210
Mixed 208
SusWrite 219
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 21.3
84% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 148
118% 165 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
316GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 135 131 131 132 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 133
Write 133
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 132
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
217% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 109%
Samsung HD754JJ 750GB
344GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 115 115 115 116 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 117
Write 120
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 116
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-001.A00LF 99U5474-001.A00LF 3GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
30% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 11.5
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.2
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback