Lenovo 20AMA2VLCD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 70% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20AMA2VLCD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20AMA2VLCD
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150616
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 25 '22 at 15:52
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Memory 39.7
1-Core 52.5
2-Core 129
40% 73.8 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 180
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2214) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.24% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 4.7
2% 4.07 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.5
2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.24%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Reborn SATA III PRO 512GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS1A25E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 287 182 51 41 45 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 363
Write 302
Mixed 287
SusWrite 148
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 6.7
50% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 14.4
72% 160 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Teikon TMTS8G58DFRBFIR-16 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
28.9% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 204
20% 204 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback