Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_S712JA

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_S712JA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X712JA
Memory	14.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220315
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '22 at 01:50
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%
CPU Throttled	83%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1035G1 53,170 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	66.1% Good	Memory 72.4 1-Core 113 2-Core 220 75% 135 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 396 48% 366 Pts	64-Core 415 26% 415 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 68,603 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1502) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	7.05% Terrible	Lighting 8.1 Reflection 3.9 Parallax 8.2 7% 6.73 fps	MRender 8.2 Gravity 8.4 Splatting 11.6 8% 9.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.05% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 298GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 738 833 820 423 388 422 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	265% Outstanding	Read 2,571 Write 2,296 Mixed 1,813 SusWrite 604 406% 1,821 MB/s	4K Read 67 4K Write 151 4K Mixed 92.2 300% 103 MB/s	DQ Read 816 DQ Write 612 DQ Mixed 662 509% 697 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 265% Great: 340%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 897GB free Firmware: JU0C2J SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 137 138 139 130 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Read 131 Write 131 Mixed 56.3 SusWrite 134 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 0.6 244% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 01BA M4S16S681LJJJ43-12 20GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 3200, 2667 MHz 4096, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.6% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 10.8 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 11 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 96 42% 96 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_S712JA Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_S712JA

CPU
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	73x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	9x
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	5x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	78x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	9x

SSD
FORESEE P900F128GH 128GBNvmeBench 100%, 229 samples	22x
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GBNvmeBench 99%, 195 samples	7x
KINGSTON OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBNvmeBench 137%, 560 samples	7x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GBMicronBench 67%, 2,461 samples	46x
HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GBHynixBench 79%, 274 samples	7x
M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 26,749 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16