| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M4A88TD-M (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20121024 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 24 '22 at 19:20 |
| Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 82% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
37.7%
Below average
|
38% 61.2 Pts
|
17% 130 Pts
|
9% 138 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.9%
Above average
|
53% 64.7 fps
|
53% 65.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 255 283 263 295 296 MB/s
|
61.7%
Good
|
67% 297 MB/s
|
96% 35.7 MB/s
|
45% 62.8 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$103
606GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 276 284 268 296 297 MB/s
|
67%
Good
|
68% 302 MB/s
|
110% 38.6 MB/s
|
47% 64.8 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
29.5%
Poor
|
30% 10.7 GB/s
|
20% 7.13 GB/s
|
27% 147 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4A88TD-M Builds (Compare 16 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4A88TD-M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X4 B55AMDBench 54%, 3,005 samples | 3x |
| Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples | 2x |
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples | 3x |
| GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples | 2x |
| GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 27% - Poor | Total price: $80 |