Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 24 '22 at 18:04
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 59.3
2-Core 107
47% 76.5 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 288
30% 240 Pts
64-Core 282
18% 282 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.2% Poor
Lighting 35.6
Reflection 38.3
Parallax 36.7
29% 36.9 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 25.7
27% 33.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial_CT275MX3 275GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 371 343 151 152 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 310
Write 416
Mixed 353
SusWrite 245
75% 331 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 29.9
102% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 97%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
931GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 170 177 180 189 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 162
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 179
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 174 176 177 177 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 132
Write 157
Mixed 111
SusWrite 172
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
297% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. M378B5773CH0-CH9 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 16.3
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 11.8
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback