| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P9X79 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140506 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 23 '22 at 21:59 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 22% |
PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
82.1%
Excellent
|
81% 139 Pts
|
61% 496 Pts
|
37% 592 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.8%
Average
|
46% 61.6 fps
|
48% 60.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 248 265 265 276 279 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
91% 405 MB/s
|
156% 52.6 MB/s
|
269% 358 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB
646GB free
Firmware: A3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 89 92 98 94 97 MB/s
|
52.9%
Above average
|
57% 77.4 MB/s
|
113% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
58.8%
Above average
|
59% 20.7 GB/s
|
45% 15.6 GB/s
|
64% 62.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,711 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples | 654x |
| Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples | 363x |
| Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples | 231x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 96x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 86x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 85x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 101% - Outstanding | Total price: $508 |