Asus P8Z77-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '22 at 05:26
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$201
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 95.7
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 185
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 495
50% 406 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 0588) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1370 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Lighting 64.8
Reflection 62.1
Parallax 86.4
53% 71.1 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 71
Splatting 46.7
48% 59.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 91 103 95 98 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 217
Write 148
Mixed 168
SusWrite 96.6
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 27.8
87% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 119
92% 123 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 73%
ASL SATA 240GB
142GB free
Firmware: FW200721
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 230 231 231 230 229 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.2% Above average
Read 254
Write 232
Mixed 219
SusWrite 230
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 12.6
86% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 18
47% 98.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 207 209 210 209 211 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 206
Write 155
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 209
120% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 119%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
324GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 183 183 184 184 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 182
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 183
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
58.1% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 18.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 18.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 54.8
73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-M Builds (Compare 1,289 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback