Asus P8Z77-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '22 at 15:37
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$200
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 95.9
1-Core 71.6
2-Core 197
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 500
49% 401 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 0588) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1370 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.3.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Lighting 64.6
Reflection 62
Parallax 86
53% 70.9 fps
MRender 61.5
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 46.6
48% 59.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 109 108 115 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 223
Write 151
Mixed 170
SusWrite 109
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 27.5
96% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 124
97% 132 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 73%
ASL SATA 240GB
149GB free
Firmware: FW200721
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 225 228 231 229 187 MB/s
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52% Above average
Read 249
Write 230
Mixed 224
SusWrite 221
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 11.4
78% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 17.9
47% 97.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 207 209 210 208 211 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 165
Mixed 88.6
SusWrite 206
121% 166 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 117%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
542GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 184 188 188 188 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 170
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 187
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 18.1
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 19.6
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 54.1
74% 54.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-M Builds (Compare 1,289 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback