Lenovo 90AS0002BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 90AS0002BR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateJun 21 '22 at 22:34
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440S-$118
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 80.5
2-Core 159
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 288
36% 276 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Legend(17AA 3098) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.84% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 5.3
2% 3.33 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 4.2
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.84%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 221 203 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 430
Write 369
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 83.3
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 6.9
44% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 88.9
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 18.5
22% 39.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
900GB free
Firmware: CC57
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 185 186 189 188 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 151
Mixed 92.8
SusWrite 187
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/8G 0114 SH5641G8FH8N6TNSQG 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.1% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.4
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90AS0002BR Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90AS0002BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $213
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback