Dell OptiPlex 5080

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell OptiPlex 5080
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 5080  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201209
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 21 '22 at 17:57
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 134
2-Core 261
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 870
83% 684 Pts
64-Core 869
54% 869 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Dell(1028 09A6) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
3.36% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 10
Parallax 8.8
5% 8.23 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.36%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Original 256GB 256GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 391 401 399 399 401 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 498
Write 391
Mixed 362
SusWrite 388
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 19.3
96% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 29.2
68% 136 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 81%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB
135GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 70 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 69.3
Write 47.8
Mixed 41
SusWrite 70.1
75% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 10.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 5080 Builds (Compare 553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 5080

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $226
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback