Daten DCM3A-4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDaten DCM3A-4  (all builds)
MotherboardDaten DAA4
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '22 at 16:16
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 61.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 259
79% 150 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 704
68% 560 Pts
64-Core 702
44% 702 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Elitegroup(1019 A107) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
9.57% Terrible
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 16.1
9% 11.8 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 15.4
Splatting 15.4
11% 12.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.57%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Daten DS2000 256GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM60.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 863
Write 990
Mixed 839
201% 897 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 43.8
145% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 347
248% 315 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 187%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 800e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 16.9
Write 3.3
Mixed 5
8% 8.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 5%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
15GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 13.8
Write 0.5
Mixed 9.7
8% 8 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD4S3200316G22-B 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 14.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 18.9
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DCM3A-4 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Daten DCM3A-4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback