| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 7.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | INTEL_ DH67CF__ |
| Motherboard | Intel DH67CF (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20121204 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 21 '22 at 05:40 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500S
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
|
70.2%
Very good
|
63% 104 Pts
|
39% 291 Pts
|
17% 280 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX
Nvidia(10DE 0592) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44
|
7.93%
Terrible
|
9% 9.27 fps
|
6% 7.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$34
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 17 20 90 142 148 MB/s
|
42.8%
Average
|
59% 264 MB/s
|
58% 20.1 MB/s
|
22% 31.6 MB/s
|
|
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$38
744GB free
Firmware: 01.01V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 119 119 119 119 MB/s
|
69.7%
Good
|
87% 117 MB/s
|
228% 1.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.6%
Above average
|
51% 17.9 GB/s
|
41% 14.4 GB/s
|
60% 66.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical DH67CF Builds (Compare 2 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel DH67CF
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 13% - Very poor | Total price: $34 |