Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_A512FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_A512FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FA
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '22 at 20:09
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 217
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 406
46% 363 Pts
64-Core 413
26% 413 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 16F1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
5.7% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 7.6
5% 6.43 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 9.9
7% 8.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.7%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1002 512GB
445GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 810 767 746 737 747 751 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,169
Write 1,224
Mixed 1,071
SusWrite 760
238% 1,056 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 63.2
217% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 765
DQ Write 644
DQ Mixed 700
526% 703 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 192%
Great: 197%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
63.7% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 18.9
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 22.4
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_A512FA Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_A512FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback