Metabox P7xxDM2-(G)

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 57% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Metabox P7xxDM2-(G) (all builds)
Motherboard	METABOX P7xxDM2 powered by premamod.com
Memory	59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170808
Uptime	4.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 11 '17 at 02:15
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	7%
CPU Throttled	57%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 76.4 2-Core 146 61% 102 Pts	4-Core 267 8-Core 422 42% 344 Pts	64-Core 420 26% 420 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Clevo(1558 7507) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.41 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.5% Poor	Lighting 9.97 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 60.4 8% 27.3 fps	MRender 62.3 Gravity 60.4 Splatting 70.4 53% 64.4 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 2TB-$320 2,669 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 2TB free Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3555 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 317 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 49 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 16 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7319171443	106% Outstanding	Read 518 Write 497 Mixed 514 114% 509 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 88.6 4K Mixed 28.8 141% 51.7 MB/s	DQ Read 304 DQ Write 293 DQ Mixed 28.4 96% 209 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 130%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 368GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	240% Outstanding	Read 2,110 Write 1,736 Mixed 1,601 404% 1,816 MB/s	4K Read 42.7 4K Write 99.2 4K Mixed 30.9 157% 57.6 MB/s	DQ Read 46.3 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 32.4 38% 64.1 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 240% Great: 353%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 142GB free Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	253% Outstanding	Read 2,224 Write 1,727 Mixed 1,607 411% 1,853 MB/s	4K Read 43.3 4K Write 99.9 4K Mixed 32.7 160% 58.6 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 232 DQ Mixed 125 129% 211 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 253% Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 93GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6679 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 407 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 52 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 32 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8615098852	91.5% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 412 Mixed 419 100% 447 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 74.9 4K Mixed 25.3 134% 47 MB/s	DQ Read 42.9 DQ Write 246 DQ Mixed 24.9 54% 104 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 4x16GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	78.6% Very good	MC Read 28 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 26.5 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 27.6 SC Mixed 21.3 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16