HP Z640 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive317% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Z640 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212A
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '22 at 09:07
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 203
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 604
61% 493 Pts
64-Core 722
45% 722 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.4.2
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.2% Above average
Lighting 62.4
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 88.2
51% 71.5 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 71.5
Splatting 47.8
49% 61.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
593GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 613000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2226 2208 1569 1654 1731 1632 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 2,248
Write 2,099
Mixed 1,940
SusWrite 1,837
457% 2,031 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 78.8
263% 93.1 MB/s
DQ Read 881
DQ Write 614
DQ Mixed 760
564% 752 MB/s
Poor: 264%
This bench: 317%
Great: 573%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40CB1-CRC 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.3
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z640 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z640 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $509
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback