TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Pavilion 14 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion 14 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 227D
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150318
Uptime26.7 Days
Run DateJun 19 '22 at 14:35
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 74
1-Core 74.7
2-Core 126
56% 91.6 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 184
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑
This bench: 51.9%
 Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 227D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.64% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 2
Parallax 5.4
2% 3.43 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 2
Splatting 4
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 2.64%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S280 480GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQ61C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 229 129 70 114 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 446
Write 349
Mixed 319
SusWrite 158
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 32.4
120% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 193
163% 237 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 75.8%
 Great: 128%
Toshiba StorE HDD 500GB
441GB free, PID 0b15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 34 35 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 35.4
Write 33
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 34.1
44% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑
This bench: 16.4%
 Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Teikon TMT41GS6BFR8A-PBHJ 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.3% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 18.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 53.3%
 Great: 60%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Pavilion 14 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 14 Notebook PC

CPU
Core i5-4210UIntelBench 41%, 82,966 samples114x
Core i5-4200UIntel  $281Bench 43%, 64,450 samples100x
Core i7-4510UIntelBench 47%, 63,054 samples83x
GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples323x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples51x
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples48x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples45x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples29x
Green 240GB (2018)WD  $56Bench 45%, 156,194 samples15x
RAM
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 27%, 14,954 samples22x
SH5641G8FJ8NWRNSQG 1x8GBSmartBench 28%, 3,351 samples20x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples18x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback