Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N5095A 431 User benchmarks, average bench 40% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Memory 46.4 1-Core 72.4 2-Core 148 49% 88.9 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 289 40% 295 Pts	64-Core 288 18% 288 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	2% Terrible	Lighting 2.9 Reflection 3.7 Parallax 3.4 2% 3.33 fps	MRender 0.3 Gravity 4.7 Splatting 0.2 1% 1.73 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 1TB 1TB 647 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 870GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2201XKR SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 351 359 358 361 350 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 400 Write 359 Mixed 342 SusWrite 352 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 21.6 4K Mixed 10.9 47% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 34 87% 179 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (82^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	56.5% Above average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 24.3 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 14.9 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 174 23% 174 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N5095AIntelBench 40%, 431 samples	19x
Celeron N5095IntelBench 43%, 1,699 samples	3x
Celeron N4500IntelBench 28%, 1,026 samples	1x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	23x

RAM
53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x8GBHynixBench 50%, 25 samples	10x
53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x8GBSamsungBench 49%, 25 samples	4x
53D512M64D4RQ-046 1x8GBHynixBench 27%, 5 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16