Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3P

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3P (all builds)
Memory	20.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090806
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '22 at 20:57
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Memory 82.5 1-Core 50.2 2-Core 99.4 50% 77.4 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 197 26% 192 Pts	64-Core 196 12% 196 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 473.62 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Lighting 64.8 Reflection 71.8 Parallax 64.4 53% 67 fps	MRender 69.9 Gravity 64.3 Splatting 56.3 51% 63.5 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 209 189 73 53 42 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.4% Average	Read 224 Write 115 Mixed 189 SusWrite 113 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 50.1 4K Mixed 24.2 82% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 32 DQ Write 54.6 DQ Mixed 38.6 31% 41.7 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 124%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 7GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 2.3 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	7.4% Terrible	Read 19.8 Write 12.8 Mixed 11.5 SusWrite 3.1 14% 11.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 2.2 121% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.4% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 24GB 14,716 User benchmarks, average bench 43% null MHz 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.5% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 12.3 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 8.1 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 76 53% 76 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-MA770T-UD3P Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3P

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	24x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	12x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	4x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	4x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	18x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	15x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $242

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16