Clevo X7200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 22 months ago.
SystemClevo X7200  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO X7200
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '22 at 20:45
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 133
60% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 329
34% 272 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 485M
Clevo(1558 7200) 2GB
CLim: 575 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 350.12
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 13.2
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 12.9
11% 16.5 fps
MRender 19.4
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 12.8
12% 15.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 133 129 116 112 109 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.8% Above average
Read 217
Write 177
Mixed 188
SusWrite 123
40% 176 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 28.9
100% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 30.1
60% 121 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 95%
Intel X25-M 160GB
126GB free
Firmware: 2CV102M3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 106 100 105 103 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 242
Write 104
Mixed 138
SusWrite 102
32% 147 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 11
63% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 86.8
DQ Mixed 11.2
38% 84.8 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 46%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB
10.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 164 157 162 164 159 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 189
Write 157
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 160
188% 145 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 2.3
230% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.6% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 11.2
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 10
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X7200 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo X7200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $612
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback