Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 231%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 249%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics214% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive302% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '22 at 16:24
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$230
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 181
2-Core 357
112% 210 Pts
4-Core 693
8-Core 1,174
113% 933 Pts
64-Core 2242
139% 2242 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 110%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$580
Palit(1569 2208) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
214% Outstanding
Lighting 321
Reflection 287
Parallax 329
261% 312 fps
MRender 344
Gravity 257
Splatting 186
206% 262 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 214%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
618GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3017 976 968 957 969 963 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 2,103
Write 3,443
Mixed 2,210
SusWrite 1,308
513% 2,266 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 93.4
232% 75.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,582
DQ Write 1,241
DQ Mixed 1,386
1,044% 1,403 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 302%
Great: 486%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 2TB
895GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2524 926 930 934 938 922 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 1597
Write 2,274
Mixed 1,647
SusWrite 1,196
379% 1,678 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 209
4K Mixed 68
255% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,808
DQ Write 1,509
DQ Mixed 1,599
1,214% 1,639 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 289%
Great: 578%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
478GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 458 459 459 459 459 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 457
Mixed 459
SusWrite 458
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 98.3
4K Mixed 57.1
188% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 220
158% 201 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 5.7 4.8 5.2 5.2 5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 100
Write 5.2
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 5.4
26% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.7
61% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT64GX4M4K3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 61.6
MC Write 45
MC Mixed 44.7
144% 50.4 GB/s
SC Read 31
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 42.5
96% 33.6 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 134%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,216
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback