Lenovo 20EN0005MB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20EN0005MB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EN0005MB
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211210
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJun 18 '22 at 15:21
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 158
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 479
47% 386 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M1000M
Legend(17AA 222E) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.91
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 16.1
13% 16.1 fps
MRender 21.7
Gravity 17.9
Splatting 14.7
14% 18.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 14%
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 222E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9865
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.32% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 6.9
5% 6.3 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 1
3% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.32%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-000L7 256GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT22L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 194 197 191 197 203 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 477
Write 224
Mixed 230
SusWrite 196
62% 282 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 30.2
115% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 212
174% 254 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 99%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150
455GB free
Firmware: AV0A3E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 123 123 122 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 108
Write 116
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 122
73% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
67.1% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 20.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20EN0005MB Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20EN0005MB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback