Asus PRIME H510M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H510M-E  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '22 at 19:22
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10105F
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 86.9
1-Core 125
2-Core 253
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 687
72% 575 Pts
64-Core 688
43% 688 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Asus(1043 8767) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.96
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.6% Above average
Lighting 76.3
Reflection 76.9
Parallax 72.7
62% 75.3 fps
MRender 63.3
Gravity 70.1
Splatting 58.2
52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC311 SATA 256GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 246 230 230 231 231 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 434
Write 416
Mixed 383
SusWrite 258
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 39.9
136% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 318
246% 336 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 97%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
112GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 89 89 89 89 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 275
Write 125
Mixed 176
SusWrite 91.9
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 35.2
126% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 92.9
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 94.1
76% 105 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 73%
Intel X25-M 160GB
39GB free
Firmware: 2CV102M3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 101 107 105 104 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 233
Write 107
Mixed 138
SusWrite 103
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 10
70% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 87
DQ Mixed 89.2
77% 115 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 46%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 172 172 173 172 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 122
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 169
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965745-008.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 28.8
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 28.7
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H510M-E Builds (Compare 6,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H510M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback