TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8575
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '22 at 11:06
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 125
2-Core 234
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 691
64% 532 Pts
64-Core 612
38% 612 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 79.9%
 Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
HP(103C 8575) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1277
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.2% Average
Lighting 57.7
Reflection 60.5
Parallax 49.2
47% 55.8 fps
MRender 39.9
Gravity 51.4
Splatting 49.3
39% 46.9 fps
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 44.2%
 Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 404 410 425 419 444 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,621
Write 1,363
Mixed 1362
SusWrite 428
267% 1,194 MB/s
4K Read 68.8
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 90.7
292% 98.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,368
DQ Write 888
DQ Mixed 1,021
790% 1,093 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑
This bench: 232%
 Great: 488%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
463GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 43 43 46 44 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 73% Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF4G64HZ-3G2E2 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 26.2
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 24
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 85.5%
 Great: 106%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx Builds (Compare 3,421 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples1,966x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples621x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples523x
GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples1,174x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples940x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples460x
SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples337x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples273x
TOSHIBA 256GBKxg60znv256gBench 173%, 3,049 samples193x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples681x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples225x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 75%, 8,097 samples175x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback