Asus F1A75-M

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	7.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus F1A75-M (all builds)
Memory	6.7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140526
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '17 at 15:26
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 631 1,364 User benchmarks, average bench 46% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	43% Average	Memory 66.5 1-Core 34.6 2-Core 73.6 38% 58.2 Pts	4-Core 109 8-Core 145 16% 127 Pts	64-Core 153 9% 153 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS-512 1,256 User benchmarks, average bench 7% BFG(19F1 0719) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	7.15% Terrible	Lighting 9.63 Reflection 8 Parallax 3.31 8% 6.98 fps	MRender 8 Gravity 7.5 Splatting 6.13 6% 7.21 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.15% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingdian S400 120GB 1,721 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01010017 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 8 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 2577 (A2) Unknown 100 100 0 (A3) Unknown 100 100 127 (A4) Unknown 100 100 118801 (A5) Unknown 100 100 4 (A6) Unknown 100 100 3 (A7) Unknown 100 100 3 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3680 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2262	32% Below average	Read 250 Write 65.3 Mixed 74.9 28% 130 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 31.1 4K Mixed 11.1 54% 19.3 MB/s	DQ Read 25 DQ Write 58.7 DQ Mixed 11.8 18% 31.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 97%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 298GB free Firmware: 12.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 156 151 5158 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2696 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3504 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2398 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1701 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2697 (C2) HDA temperature 101 91 46 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	41.6% Average	Read 77.1 Write 67.3 Mixed 29.9 43% 58.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.34 100% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 109GB free Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 100 82827038 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2522 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 61 60 1392569 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1075 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 890 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 98 98 2 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 93 55835426831 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 50 740753450 (C2) HDA temperature 42 50 60129542186 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 33 27 82827038 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 506436 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -13365938221890 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2738769919 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2852592946	50.9% Above average	Read 79.8 Write 97.5 Mixed 23.2 49% 66.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.37 80% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1333KLN-2G JM1333KLU-2G JM1333KLU-2G 10GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 9.4 28% 9.87 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.8 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A75-M Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M

CPU
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	10x
A6-3670 APUAMDBench 46%, 2,400 samples	4x
Athlon II X4 641AMDBench 48%, 1,109 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	5x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	3x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	1x
SP900 256GBAdata $300Bench 74%, 9,430 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	1x
99P5471-004.A01LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 601 samples	1x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $108

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16