Acer Predator PH315-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics71.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PH315-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Covini_CFS
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 16 '22 at 17:23
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 750
74% 607 Pts
64-Core 948
59% 948 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1343) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1295
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Lighting 89.6
Reflection 95
Parallax 82.9
73% 89.2 fps
MRender 95.1
Gravity 82.9
Splatting 74.6
68% 84.2 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON RBUSNS8 256GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 622 532 322 156 129 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 699
Write 668
Mixed 630
SusWrite 317
130% 578 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 43.7
137% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 699
DQ Write 615
DQ Mixed 484
410% 599 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 120%
Great: 130%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$74
328GB free
Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1765 1073 1087 988 1042 1023 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,490
Write 2,203
Mixed 1,690
SusWrite 1,163
370% 1,636 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 56.5
190% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 1,006
DQ Write 770
DQ Mixed 897
668% 891 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 229%
Great: 335%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
467GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 63 62 64 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 77.8
Write 109
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 63.4
58% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C20 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 23.6
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 25.9
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 57.8
69% 57.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-52 Builds (Compare 3,937 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback