Asrock H510M-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 140% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 129% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	160% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H510M-HDV (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210423
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '22 at 14:36
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Memory 93.8 1-Core 124 2-Core 231 85% 149 Pts	4-Core 449 8-Core 792 75% 620 Pts	64-Core 1,003 62% 1,003 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Gigabyte(1458 404C) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	160% Outstanding	Lighting 238 Reflection 218 Parallax 209 194% 221 fps	MRender 220 Gravity 158 Splatting 142 138% 174 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot P210 256GB 5,446 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN08213 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 485 Write 451 Mixed 382 98% 439 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 83.2 4K Mixed 41.1 151% 53.5 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 196 155% 210 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 100%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 162GB free Firmware: SVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 173 82 83 83 83 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 475 Mixed 437 SusWrite 162 88% 395 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 83.6 4K Mixed 48 159% 55.5 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 353 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 128%
WD Elements 500GB 10,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 370GB free, PID 1078 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 86 85 86 85 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 85.3 Write 86.6 Mixed 53.6 SusWrite 85.3 105% 77.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G Skill Intl F4-4000C18-8GVK 2x8GB 389 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.2% Very good	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 31.5 MC Mixed 23 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 26.1 SC Mixed 16.6 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 60.3 66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 137%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H510M-HDV Builds (Compare 553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock H510M-HDV

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	128x
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	64x
Core i5-11400FIntel $115Bench 94%, 46,609 samples	54x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	43x
RTX 3060Nvidia $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	40x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	37x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	26x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	13x

RAM
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 94%, 22,102 samples	20x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	16x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $291

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16