Lenovo 20TD001JFR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20TD001JFR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20TD001JFR
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220121
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 16 '22 at 10:18
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 72.1
1-Core 157
2-Core 288
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 660
70% 562 Pts
64-Core 644
40% 644 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 5088) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 26.4
Parallax 29.1
20% 26.5 fps
MRender 21.6
Gravity 34.2
Splatting 20.7
20% 25.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ512HALU-000L1 512GB
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BL1QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 933 967 260 280 263 275 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,142
Write 927
Mixed 909
SusWrite 496
194% 869 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 62.5
211% 75.3 MB/s
DQ Read 893
DQ Write 422
DQ Mixed 894
600% 736 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 171%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 13.8
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 12.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 96.7
41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20TD001JFR Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20TD001JFR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback