ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 20YQ004TUS

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 20YQ004TUS (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 20YQ004TUS
Memory	115.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, , 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220415
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '22 at 19:22
Run Duration	284 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-11950H 660 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	80% Excellent	Memory 56.6 1-Core 150 2-Core 297 87% 168 Pts	4-Core 554 8-Core 924 90% 739 Pts	64-Core 1,129 70% 1,129 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 22D8) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	6.78% Terrible	Lighting 7.6 Reflection 35.5 Parallax 9.1 6% 17.4 fps	MRender 12.6 Gravity 10.6 Splatting 7 8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.78% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$122 7,464 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1631 1768 1718 1766 1778 1782 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	265% Outstanding	Read 977 Write 1,786 Mixed 1,278 SusWrite 1,740 329% 1,445 MB/s	4K Read 50.3 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 78.3 240% 82.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,098 DQ Write 864 DQ Mixed 1,031 758% 997 MB/s
Poor: 129% ↑ This bench: 265% Great: 307%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160 182,136 User benchmarks, average bench 402% 1TB free Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2165 2013 2002 2002 1965 2040 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	355% Outstanding	Read 2,294 Write 2,276 Mixed 2,166 SusWrite 2,031 494% 2,192 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 178 4K Mixed 92.3 271% 103 MB/s	DQ Read 1,354 DQ Write 1,062 DQ Mixed 1,195 898% 1,204 MB/s
Poor: 278% ↑ This bench: 355% Great: 508%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$122 7,464 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 1TB free Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1721 1638 1421 411 83 78 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	212% Outstanding	Read 816 Write 1,651 Mixed 1,246 SusWrite 892 262% 1,151 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 202 4K Mixed 67.1 258% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,101 DQ Write 981 DQ Mixed 1,158 836% 1,080 MB/s
Poor: 129% ↑ This bench: 212% Great: 307%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A4G43AB1-CWE Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.C16FE M471A4G43AB1-CWE Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.C16FE 127GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	72.7% Very good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 24.1 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 34.8 SC Mixed 17.2 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical 20YQ004TUS Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation

Workstation 109%

UFO

System: Lenovo 20YQ004TUS

CPU
Core i9-11950HIntelBench 92%, 660 samples	19x

GPU
RTX A5000 Laptop GPUNvidiaBench 117%, 371 samples	10x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples	9x

SSD
MZVL21T0HCLR-00BL7 1TBSamsungBench 366%, 6,802 samples	14x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $160Bench 402%, 182,136 samples	2x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBIntel $192Bench 217%, 33,949 samples	1x

RAM
M471A4G43AB1-CWE 4x31.8GBSamsungBench 87%, 173 samples	12x
16ATF4G64HZ-3G2E2 4x31.8GBMicronBench 88%, 27 samples	2x
HMAA2GS6AJR8N-XN 2x16GBHynixBench 86%, 4,405 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback