Kamloops Energy

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (1st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 99 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemKamloops Energy  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120418
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateJun 15 '22 at 16:29
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 87%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$183
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
41.3% Average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 58.4
2-Core 94.6
46% 73.4 Pts
4-Core 84.8
8-Core 140
14% 112 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 512.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.8% Below average
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 41.6
32% 39.9 fps
MRender 63
Gravity 30.2
Splatting 43.8
37% 45.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 212 212 194 179 182 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
60% Above average
Read 333
Write 246
Mixed 216
SusWrite 204
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 20.3
70% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 199
171% 255 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 60%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-015.A00LF 9905474-050.A00LF 9905474-050.A00LF SUPERTALENT02 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 10.3
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Energy Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Kamloops Energy

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback