HP Laptop 15q-bu0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemHP Laptop 15q-bu0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 832A
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190304
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJun 15 '22 at 15:09
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 115
52% 84.3 Pts
4-Core 25.6
8-Core 105
7% 65.1 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 832A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
2.6% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 2.2
2% 2.9 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 5
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.6%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK62B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 199 141 108 80 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 391
Write 185
Mixed 296
SusWrite 138
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 33.2
124% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 60.7
DQ Mixed 68.4
80% 145 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.C8FDD1 Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.6% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 20
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 17.6
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 1%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15q-bu0xx Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15q-bu0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback