Lenovo 20221

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20221  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130204
Uptime10.5 Days
Run DateJun 15 '22 at 14:29
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 77.3
1-Core 59
2-Core 122
53% 86.1 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 182
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
Legend(17AA 3904) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
5.79% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 8.6
6% 6.27 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 8.5
6% 7.27 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.79%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3H01103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 296 318 376 413 413 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 413
Write 304
Mixed 119
SusWrite 339
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 14.3
68% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 59.9
85% 156 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3160ED58E9W1600 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.1% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 12.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20221 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20221

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $126
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback